Next we don't know if Dexter is evil or not, does he abandon his family so that he can keep on killing people? That's pretty close to evil, the real question is if he gave up fighting his urge to kill. While those movies are fun lets not pretend they are anything but flimsy revenge fantasies used as a excuse to glorify violence. John feels that his motives (somebody shot his dog) justices all the actions he makes after that and he doesn't really care how many people pay the price or if they are innocent or not, that's definitely evil and narcissistic to the point of being a sociopath. Because he has the capacity to be that evil. Hence why John is able to murder hundreds over his dog. Just because they no longer commit actions like that doesn't make them less evil. Think of a drug lord that "retires" who tortured and killed kids in the past but is now considered a good neighbor. Just because he retired, doesn't mean he's not evil. "People keep asking me if I'm back, well I'm back!" John willing embraced those actions before retiring and later embraces them again for revenge. A much better argument could be made for Agent 47 over John Wick. As you said he murders hundreds of people, many of them innocent, for his job before retiring. These are interesting choices you made and I would like to make an argument for them. What If Fiction ( This is the best place for "general" questions)įor non-serious answers for real world science problems try:Īnd just for fun, don't forget to check out our friends at Who would win ( Go here for questions about who would win in a fight or competition between two or more characters) This subreddit is for discussion of fiction using information about the universe and not meta information about the work. Spoilers from works older than six months may optionally be concealed using our flair system, however this is CSS-based and will work only in browsers.Our Spoiler policy must be observed for six months following the date of release.Comment spoilers should be formatted on a separate line as >!.Replace "Canon" with the work or body of fiction in question. If only the body of your post contains spoilers, you may instead make the title " Spoilers: Canon" and not use the link flair. The title of your post should not contain spoilers for six months from the date of release."Speed Force" with no further explanation when asked a question about the Flash) do not constitute satisfactory answers. Report anything that discusses metadata or involves personal attacks. Upvote good content downvote incorrect information.(This doesn't, of course, mean there isn't room for further discussion.) Search for your question, it may have been asked and answered before.Any sort of competition questions belong in whowouldwin.AskScience and AskHistorians exist for that. r/whatiffiction, a sister subreddit, has rules more accommodating to these sort of questions. General questions are discouraged without a firm set of in-universe rules, most of them boil down to "whatever the writer chooses" in terms of answers.Avoid questions about real-world pseudoscience (i.e. Any fiction is allowed not just science fiction.You already know Bruce Wayne is Batman, you already know Darth Vader is Anakin Skywalker, you already know Sauron is evil. However, if you choose to roleplay, please remember that you must answer as if you had all the information available to a member of the audience. We discourage but do not forbid roleplaying.Answer the questions from a Watsonian perspective only- no Doylist answers.your posts with the setting you wish to discuss.Take the fictional rules of the universe to their logical conclusion, ad absurdum. Doylist perspective can be found here, here, and in the dictionary definitions of the two terms.) Or as calls it Watsonian, not a Doylist point of view (Further reading on Watsonian vs. Use in-universe knowledge, rules, and common sense to answer the questions. It's like Ask Science, but all questions and answers are written with answers gleaned from the universe itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |